Re: Anyone have contact info for Taylos, SwanKiller, SmokingMom? (Dark Side Forum)

Re: Anyone have contact info for Taylos, SwanKiller, SmokingMom?
Author: Le Fettische	June 10, 2010 at 10:36:14
in reply to: Re: Anyone have contact info for Taylos, SwanKiller, SmokingMom?* posted by Jason on June 10, 2010 at 00:59:02*

> For me, I love the addiction aspect (specially the begining of addiction), which David's posts seemed to focus on. His "Wendy" story depicted this in a great way. I know the YS angle bothers some people, but it's really common in the "start smoking" angle, so I don't have so much of a problem with it.
>
I think it's natural that the onset of addiction, as well as the first-time breaking of the taboo, the initiation into the sensual pleasure, and all the other things about smoking that can easily be fetishized, would be more exciting to imagine happening at a young age.

I think a lot of people probably have a problem with the YS fetish because they think of it something like this: Women are sexy-looking; they look the most sexy smoking; that's why guys have a fetish for it. Therefore if a guy thinks little girls look sexy smoking, he must be following the same course of thought.

However, I think the process is closer to this: Women look sexy smoking; part of the reason is that they're not supposed to; little girls doing the same thing can look sexy in the same way; and they're ten times more not supposed to smoke, and a hundred times more not supposed to look sexy; that makes it even sexier.

Probably guys who have never felt this way feel outraged that others do, in the same way other people get outraged by people having a thing for dogs, or corpses.

But also probably a lot of guys do share the feeling, or would if they allowed themselves to, but believe that entertaining it is playing with fire, risking the chance that they might want to act it out or that it might stir other feelings they might act out, and that it thereby puts kids at risk. I understand this but I think it's kind of an easy out. I think mainly they just don't want to admit or encourage that feeling in themselves because it's wicked. (They'd probably use a less old-fashioned word, though.) And there I'd agree with them: it is "wicked." And "wickedness" is sexy.

If David were here, he'd probably have something to say about this.

Follow Ups

Re: Anyone have contact info for Taylos, SwanKiller, SmokingMom? Jason 14:15:47 6/10/2010 (1)
- Re: Anyone have contact info for Taylos, SwanKiller, SmokingMom? Le Fettische 15:16:42 6/11/2010 (0)

Post Followup

Name:
E-Mail:
Subject:
> > For me, I love the addiction aspect (specially the begining of addiction), which David's posts seemed to focus on. His "Wendy" story depicted this in a great way. I know the YS angle bothers some people, but it's really common in the "start smoking" angle, so I don't have so much of a problem with it. > > > I think it's natural that the onset of addiction, as well as the first-time breaking of the taboo, the initiation into the sensual pleasure, and all the other things about smoking that can easily be fetishized, would be more exciting to imagine happening at a young age. > > I think a lot of people probably have a problem with the YS fetish because they think of it something like this: Women are sexy-looking; they look the most sexy smoking; that's why guys have a fetish for it. Therefore if a guy thinks little girls look sexy smoking, he must be following the same course of thought. > > However, I think the process is closer to this: Women look sexy smoking; part of the reason is that they're not supposed to; little girls doing the same thing can look sexy in the same way; and they're ten times more not supposed to smoke, and a hundred times more not supposed to look sexy; that makes it even sexier. > > Probably guys who have never felt this way feel outraged that others do, in the same way other people get outraged by people having a thing for dogs, or corpses. > > But also probably a lot of guys do share the feeling, or would if they allowed themselves to, but believe that entertaining it is playing with fire, risking the chance that they might want to act it out or that it might stir other feelings they might act out, and that it thereby puts kids at risk. I understand this but I think it's kind of an easy out. I think mainly they just don't want to admit or encourage that feeling in themselves because it's wicked. (They'd probably use a less old-fashioned word, though.) And there I'd agree with them: it is "wicked." And "wickedness" is sexy. > > If David were here, he'd probably have something to say about this.
Optional link URL:
Link title:
Optional image URL: